Monday, November 7, 2011

Money Talks and We All Know What Walks...

So let me ask you a question... If you had to chose a QB for the next 6 games, and you knew they would perform as follows, which one would you pick?


QB#RecordCompAttYdsTDIntQB RateCmp %Yds/AttTD%Int%
#1
3-3
81
168
1108
9
4
77.7
48.2
6.6
5.4
2.4
#2
3-3
85
163
1035
5
10
56.7
52.1
6.3
3.1
6.1
#3
3-3
107
167
1076
2
7
68.8
64.1
6.4
1.2
4.2
#4
2-4
49
114
620
1
6
41.2
43.0
5.4
0.9
5.3

None of them give you a winning record over the 6 games, so it might seem like a worthless comparison.  Please humor me and allow me to change the question....


Which quarterback would you pick if you had to pick one for the entire season, if you knew this is how they would play for the first 6 games?  Basically, the question becomes which one seems to be the QB that gives you the best chance to win the rest of the year.

Would you pick the most accurate one? (#3). Would you pick the one with the most TD's, highest QB rating and lowest Interception Percent? (#1). Would you pick QB#4? He has the worst record so far and lowest completion percentage. What would you say if I told you that QB#4, the 1 TD and 6 interception guy is destined for the Hall of Fame?

Let's stop the secrecy, tell you who everyone is, and what this is all about. Each of these QB's stats is for their first 6 professional starts. QB#1 is Mr. Inaccurate, Tim Tebow. QB#2 is Mark Sanchez. QB#3 is Joe Flacco. QB #4 is, ironically, John Elway after what I believe  (I couldn't get definitive verification so I apologize if this is inaccurate) to be his stats after his first 6 starts.

So what is my point????

I am not a Tebow fan or hater. As a matter of fact, I thought is was an extremely foolish move to trade draft picks to move up to choose him in the 1st round. I thought if Denver wanted him they could have gotten him in the 2nd at least. Not his fault. That being said, it seems like there is a lot of "piling on" by the experts without much in the way of a factual basis.  One prognosticator has suggested that if Flacco or Sanchez played "like this" the team would not have put up with it. Put up with what? All these guys are 2-2. Even the Denver legend, Elway, had a worse start.

In general, Tebow has protected the ball better than these other guys and has fared at least as well in wins and losses. I think it is time to let the kid have his first 16 starts before folks start to burn him in effigy...



NameRecordCompAttYdsTDIntQB RateCmp %Yds/AttTD%Int%
Tebow
3-3
81
168
1108
9
4
77.7
48.2
6.6
5.4
2.4
Sanchez
3-3
85
163
1035
5
10
56.7
52.1
6.3
3.1
6.1
Flacco
3-3
107
167
1076
2
7
68.8
64.1
6.4
1.2
4.2
Elway
2-4
49
114
620
1
6
41.2
43.0
5.4
0.9
5.3



Bo

No comments:

Post a Comment